Blog
Search

Blog

Advocates Derail SABMiller/UK Civil Service Conflict of Interest

October 30, 2014


John Manzoni, the new Chief Executive of the UK Civil Service, has agreed to step down down from his concurrent position as SABMiller Chairman of the Board after Alcohol Health Alliance UK (AHA) coordinated opposition against the dual positions, outlining the inherent conflict of interest.

Manzoni's vested interest in SABMiller would be in direct conflict with the UK civil service mission and projects under his leadership, which include public health and safety. UK Civil Service Standards require him to put the obligations of public service above personal interests, and base advice and decisions on rigorous analysis of the evidence. Manzoni's SABMiller leadership position was paid in company shares, giving Manzoni a direct personal interest in the company's growth and profits. Even as a pro-bono board member, Manzoni would be obligated to put the corporation's profits first. As SABMiller also shares strong commercial ties and financial interest in The Altria Group, the tobacco company formerly known as Philip Morris Companies Inc., Manzoni would also be obligated to put tobacco and alcohol sales at primary importance. Altria owns nearly one-third of SABMiller. SABMiller is also a member of the industry front group Portman Group, which already has heavy and high-level influence in the UK, most recently using its influence to quash a government proposal for minimum pricing.

Alcohol Justice supported the AHA position, and signed on to the letter, which can be read in full here.
 

Industry Front Groups Unite to Own Public Discourse About Alcohol-Related Harm

October 28, 2014

Two Big Alcohol trade groups, the International Center for Alcohol Policies (ICAP) and the Global Alcohol Producers Group (GAPG), recently announced their merger and appointment of a new CEO.  ICAP, a decades-old industry front group, and GAPG, a newer iteration of mostly the same alcohol producers, merged earlier this year in a move to strengthen industry efforts to influence alcohol policy decisions worldwide.

The name of the new industry group is the International Alliance of Responsible Drinking (IARD). Sound familiar? It's remarkably close to the newly-renamed, U.S.-based Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility (FAAR), which is funded by spirits producers/importers through DISCUS and was previously called the Century Council. The alcohol producers who make up IARD, all prior members of ICAP and/or GAPG, include: Anadolu EFES, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Asahi Breweries, Bacardi, Beam Suntory, Brewers Association of Japan, Brown-Forman, Carlsberg, Constellation, Diageo, Heineken, Japan Spirits & Liquor Makers Association, Kirin, Moët Hennessy, Molson Coors, Pernod Ricard, and SABMiller.

IARD will continue efforts to stifle the World Health Organization's (WHO) policy recommendations regarding alcohol-related harm, despite the clearly stated WHO position that alcohol industry should not be involved in public health policy decision-making. Both ICAP and GAPG seek to block WHO's recommended evidence-based policies to reduce excessive consumption and alcohol related harm: restriction on access and availability; restrictions on alcohol advertising and promotion; and increasing the price of alcohol though policies such as taxes and minimum pricing.

Industry alliances such as IARD, ICAP, and GAPG work to control the public discourse surrounding alcohol-related harm, focusing the public far from alcohol products as the cause of harm and providing positive PR for alcohol producers. They fund academic researchers to discredit the evidence of alcohol-related harm from their products and marketing tactics, and promote spurious research to support the industry/producer agenda. They use "Drink Responsibly" as a marketing tactic to build loyalty and promote alcohol while blaming youth, parents, schools, police, and anyone else but the product and corporate practices for alcohol-related harm. The press release about the merger refers to this piece of the industry agenda as "promoting understanding of responsible drinking."

According to the 2014 WHO Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health, alcohol causes 5.9% of deaths worldwide, and 5.1% of the global burden of disease. One wonders if the GAPG tag line will have any role in new IARD promotional materials. Or perhaps Big Alcohol achieved its goal of "GIVING GLOBAL ALCOHOL PRODUCERS A VOICE" and will continue its agenda hiding behind the IARD "responsible drinking" facade.


Cambodian Govt. Bans TV, Radio Alcohol Ads

October 28, 2014


Angkor Beer advertisement in Cambodia
In a progressive move to reduce alcohol-impaired driving, the Cambodian government recently enacted a ban on television and radio alcohol advertising to address the thirteen percent of traffic fatalities in Cambodia due to drunk driving last year.

The ban will initially take place during the prime-time hours of 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. A total ban on radio and television advertising for liquor and beer will take effect on January 1, 2015, Although TV stations will not accept video, they will still accept alcohol logos and a ticker with words across the bottom of the screen.

For information on how restrictions on alcohol advertising and promotion help to reduce alcohol-related harm among youth in the U.S., read our fact sheet.



Ineffective State Alcohol Bills Popular in the U.S.

October 28, 2014

A new study by University of Minnesota and Boston University researchers indicates that a majority of recently enacted U.S. state laws are politically popular, yet ineffective to address excessive drinking and alcohol-impaired driving.

Such laws, including requiring ignition interlocks for repeat DUI offenders and setting a minimum age for those selling and serving alcohol, are typically targeted at specific groups. They are favored by the alcohol industry because they don't significantly impact alcohol sales, and direct the blame for alcohol-related harm to individual drinkers rather than the alcohol industry itself.

The study found that, in large part because of the alcohol industry's lobbying clout, laws that enact evidence-based policies such as increased alcohol pricing, restrictions on alcohol advertising, and restrictions on alcohol access and availability are less likely to be proposed or passed. These policies target the population as a whole rather than specific groups, and have been deemed effective through a preponderance of peer-reviewed research.

The study's authors also note the dire consequences arising from the political inability to enact effective alcohol prevention policies: 88,000 deaths each year in the U.S., and $223.5 billion in economic harm.