In the Doghouse

You are here: Home

Watchdogging

In the Doghouse

Blood Weighs Heavy on Light Beer

Details: Published: Tuesday, November 03 2020 00:39

boycott kirin ichiban over their involvement in the Rohingya genocide For each sip of Kirin Ichiban’s beer that trickles down consumers’ throats, more money trickles into the pockets of Myanmar’s genocidal military, according to Amnesty International. In a series of reports over the past two years, the organization has flagged a partnership between the Japanese megabrewer Kirin and Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd. (MEHL), a business conglomerate directly owned by Myanmar armed forces. In response, the International Campaign for the Rohingya is urging a boycott of the Japanese-based megabrewer as part of a continued effort to halt human rights abuses along the Myanmar-Bangladesh border.

In 2017, Myanmar armed forces, in response to militant attacks on police outposts, began systematically destroying the villages of the primarily Muslim Rohingya ethnic minority. To date, at least 280 villages have been destroyed, and 6,700 people killed by violence, as well as over half the total population forced to flee to refugee camps in neighboring Bangladesh. The remaining half million Rohingya in Myanmar remain at serious risk, according to the UN.

In the case of Kirin, this is not merely a case of money invested in the developing world being appropriated by bad actors. According to the Guardian, unlike companies in the United States (and most of the rest of the world), MEHL holdings are split into ownership by individual military battalions. Amnesty International has been able to track MEHL shareholder dividends down to specific units complicit in war crimes against the Rohingya.

Kirin has expressed concern and promised to start investigating, but to date there is no documented effort to decouple its brewing business from the military. Until it does, Alcohol Justice stands with Rohingya International in urging a boycott of Kirin products.

Products produced by Kirin include:

Kirin Ichiban (USA)
Four Roses (bourbon, USA)
San Miguel (Philippines)
Brooklyn Brewery (USA)
New Belgium Brewery (Fat Tire, USA)
Fourpure Brewing (UK)
Magic Rock (UK)
Tooheys (Australia)
Speight’s (Australia)
Panhead (New Zealand)
Emerson’s (New Zealand)

READ MORE about the Kirin boycott

READ MORE about how Big Alcohol profits off misery in the developing world

Babe Wine: Condescending, Concentrated, and #COVIDwashed

Details: Published: Friday, May 08 2020 21:19

An AB InBev poses with Babe Wine while wearing a football jersey because women deserve to experience alcohol harm too There are several marketing strategies that are guaranteed to get a product in the AJ doghouse. Does it used gendered branding to target women? Does it piggyback on a sports sponsorship, thus reaching tens of millions of underage viewers? Is it formulated and packaged in a way to all but guarantee dangerous consumption patterns?

Annheuser-Busch InBev’s newly acquired Babe Wine does all three, and shamelessly adds another: urging consumers to drink to ease the anxiety that accompanies the global COVID-19 outbreak. This is a remarkable quadfecta of contempt for consumers.

Babe was initially brought to market by a group headed up by Josh Ostrovsky, an internet influencer known also as The Fat Jew. Ostrovsky, already notorious for stealing other online comedians’ work and passing it off as his own, joined with two business partners to launch a brand targeted squarely at young women. Co-founder David Oliver Cohen told Fortune magazine, “One thing that stood out to us was there was nothing in the wine and spirits space for women and younger drinkers to drink at sporting events and concert venues.”

Yet this targeting is of particular concern. Women currently make for a ripe target for the alcohol industry in the United States, having drank less frequently and at less volume than men in the past. This gap has closed quickly, however, and the surge of consumption among women has created an identical surge in diagnoses of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This is compounded by the fact that women who drink face risks that men do not, particularly a dramatically increased risk of breast cancer.

Needless to say, this risk has also meant a windfall for Big Alcohol.

AB InBev has been quick to enjoy this windfall, buying Babe out (but continuing its association with Ostrovsky) and making it the official wine of the NFL. Because alcohol marketing through sporting events—and AB InBev’s ownership of NFL marketing in particular—reaches tens of millions of youth nationally, Babe is positioning itself to be attractive to underage girls. Since exposure to alcohol marketing predicts younger drinking, and since the earlier someone starts drinking the more likely they are to develop unhealthy drinking patterns, Babe and the NFL become a perfect vortex to bring additional alcohol harm to young women.

This is worsened by the fact that Babe is stronger than beer, and dramatically so. A can of Budweiser is around 4% alcohol by volume. A can of Babe, on the other hand, is three times as strong. A single can would bring a drinker to threshold of binge drinking for women; two cans would go well beyond binge level for woman or men.

Yet this is made worse yet by Babe’s newest ad campaign. In an email headlined “WE JUST WANT YOU TO BE HAPPY,” the brand proudly boasts “We are the official wine of daydrinking and falling asleep by 10pm so you don’t wake up feeling like a complete garbage.” [sic] This email, which comes with a discount code for ordering in bulk, was sent in late April. In short, it takes advantage of laxened restrictions around delivery to promote all-day drinking during COVID-related shelter-in-place orders. This is not just tacky and tone deaf, it is another example of Big Alcohol deliberately undermining public health.

There are multiple issues surrounding the world’s treatment of alcohol during this crisis. Among them is a reckless promotion of alcohol purchasing as an economic driver, even though alcohol a) lowers inhibitions thus encouraging reckless behavior; b) is associated with domestic violence and other interpersonal trauma; and c) suppresses the immune system. The WHO strongly recommends limiting, not promoting, alcohol access during lockdowns. Yet instead, many common-sense alcohol regulations have been lifted throughout the United States.

In the case of a product like Babe, even the commonly used excuse—that loosened alcohol sale regulations provide economic protections for the service industry—are rendered meaningless. Annheuser-Busch InBev is a multinational alcohol megacorporation; there is no benefit to communities in allowing it to drop cases of a high-potency wine targeted at (very) young women on peoples’ doorsteps. This is #COVIDwashing pure and simple: capitalizing on the fear, misery, and confusion in a time of illness to make money from a product that kills as relentlessly as any virus.

READ MORE about reckless alcohol deregulation in response to COVID-19.

READ MORE about pinkwashing—the industry practice of targeting women using breast cancer awareness to sell a cancer-causing product.

WATCH Fake Randy Diaz tell us to get AB InBev out of the NFL.

Bartender-Free Bars: Less Staffing Is Less Safe

Details: Published: Friday, October 25 2019 09:53

pour-it-yourself taps from a bar in San Francisco

A new trend has appeared in the alcohol service market: pour-it-yourself bars. These bars allow patrons to purchase a swipe card that entitles them to pour their own beers. The strange science-fiction setup, with screens above every tap displaying what's available and how much the customer is spending, hides the fact that this style of serving brings back a very basic problem in alcohol service: how to make sure that each patron is of legal drinking age, and that they are not over-consuming. By eliminating face-to-face contact with bartenders, pour-it-yourself venues not only reduce jobs, they eliminate the people best able to make for a safer bar.

In fact, California is in the middle of rolling out a mandatory responsible beverage service (RBS) training program for all alcohol servers. This program will provide staff with many of the skills necessary to promote safer consumption, including how to spot a fake ID, how to tell if a patron has drunk too much, and how to safely discourage intoxicated customers from driving. RBS is an evidence-based means to reduce alcohol harm; it stands to reason, then, that eliminating RBS-trained staff is an evidence-based ways to increase it.

That overlooks the more basic flaws in the system. Although the swipe-card makes customers interact with at least one staff member, it does not take a lot of planning to figure out how to defraud the system. Underage patrons can use a single buyer's cup, cut-off patrons can simply borrow a different swipe card, and there is no one to call a cab for a customer who is too deep in the swipes.

"These bars are dangerous, no question," said Michael Scippa, Public Affairs Director at Alcohol Justice. "They run the risk of getting a customer hurt or getting extra drunk drivers behind the wheel. And for what? To cut some jobs and make some dough? Why that's almost as dumb as extending bar hours to 3 or 4 a.m."

As Eater.com notes, pour-it-yourself systems are part of a restaurant trend towards "fast casual," where the business owner reduces overhead by eliminating as many staff positions as possible. Yet time and time again public health and safety advocates hear arguments that more liquor licenses are necessary to create jobs and help hospitality businesses stay in the black. If this quasi-futuristic concept means fewer jobs and more alcohol harm, is it a future any of us really needs?

READ MORE about the brave new world of booze.